Nom de Plume

Arguments have been made that literary agents and publishers prefer to represent and distribute work done by men over that done of women. While there is no scientific studies I can point to, there is certainly enough anecdotal evidence to lead a female writer to wonder whether the lack of interest in her work is about the work or about the name accompanying it. My suspicion is that any woman in a male-dominated profession has come up against these stereotypical obstacles. Whether is be the law, STEM-based professions, politics and the like, some have disguised their femaleness in order to leap those hurdles.

Sandra Day O’Connor wasn’t appointed to SCOTUS until 1981. She is one of four women of the 112 Supreme Court judges in U.S. history. This, despite the fact that since 1992, law school enrollment has been equally split between men and women.

Articles like this one illustrate the matter with respect to science.

We all have seen the double standard applied to women politicians. Here’s a  link comparing the volume of a female politician versus male ones.

And when it comes to writing, there very well may be the same hurdles. I think of S.E. Hinton, J.K. Rowling, George Eliot when it comes to writers with ambiguous, or even, “male” names. I wonder whether my stories would be welcomed and indulged were I to become “J.K. Brownson” or “Blake Brownson.”

This morning I was wondering it so much that I went ahead and created a nom de plume. Over the next few months, I’m going to see whether it matters. The report from my experience will be anecdotal, but it will be mine.

As much as I have heard, “In the end, it’s all about the writing,” I can’t help but wonder whether it’s the writing and the 23rd chromosome.

Image result for 23rd chromosome

 

9 thoughts on “Nom de Plume

  1. I like the idea of this experiment, too. It’s like, why not? I’m guessing what makes this unique is that no matter what the results are, it will be surprising. I don’t think you are doing something to prove a point here, it sounds like you are exploring to see what happens… if that makes sense.

    Keep us posted.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Even if you were trying to prove a point, what would that matter? Joanne Rowling’s “J.K.” was used deliberately because her editor or publisher (I don’t remember which) specifically said that there wouldn’t be enough interest in a book about a boy wizard written by a woman.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, I know the lore relative to J.K. Maybe I’m in a similar boat writing the stories I do. On the balance, I’ve written more in male point of view than female. Plus I’ve got that analytical brain, which some say is more XY than XX. We’ll see . . .

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s